Your Friendly Neighborhood Spider: Sociality in Spiders

By Cameron Jones

Picture1

Stegodyphus mimosarum rum work together to subdue a grasshopper that flew into their web.

When you think of spiders, the idea of them living or working together is probably the last thing that crosses your mind. After all, aside from when an egg sac has just hatched, we rarely see spiders together let alone interacting with each other. There is good reason for this: in spiders, group behavior, or what scientists call sociality is very rare. In fact, of the more than 45,000 species of spiders known, only about

80-90 species exhibit some sort of sociality. Despite its rarity, its existence makes spiders even more amazing.

Sociality is a phenomenon that occurs in many different animals, from lions to bees to humans. There are obvious benefits that are associated with being social like protection from predators, help catching food, and assistance in raising young. But there’s a reason why not all animals are social, because with sociality comes a lot of costs such as an increase in disease risk and competition. With carnivorous animals like spiders, sociality is exceptionally rare and for good reason: you could be living with a potential predator! Yet despite this risk, social spiders still exist and scientists have sought to determine just how they evolved this way.

Not all social spiders are web-builders, but most social spider species are. These spiders can have hundreds to thousands of individuals that live together in a web such as Anelosimus eximius. When prey gets snagged in a web, they pounce on the victim and subdue it, cooperating to bring down large prey. Species of these type of spiders rarely leave the web and hardly ever encounter spiders from other colonies. Another explanation for their sociality is the fact that the costs of allowing spiders to join the colony is usually low and therefore doesn’t lower the fitness of other spiders in the colony.

Anelosimus eximius_1

Anelosimus eximius can have thousands of spiders living in a web together

There are also a few non-web building spider species that are termed “subsocial” to describe the fact that offspring leave the nest retreat after reaching sexual maturity. Unlike the web-building spiders, these species can discriminate against non-kin and are very intolerant towards non-colony mates entering their retreat.  A well-studied species is Delena cancerides, a large huntsman spider from Australia. Colonies of this species consist of a single matriarch and several cohorts of her own offspring. Because they don’t rely on a web, individuals in a colony will go out and hunt for food or grab whatever prey wanders by their nest which is behind bark of eucalyptus trees. However, their sociality extends beyond the fact that they live together. Spiders in a colony will also share prey with their younger colony mates!  Currently scientists are trying to determine f how these spiders distinguish colony mates from unrelated intruders as well as the factors that lead to evolution of sociality in other non-web-building spiders. As for life in a D. cancerides colony, things aren’t all loving and happy. As the matriarch gets older and weaker, her mature daughters that haven’t dispersed will kill her and fight for control over the retreat. That just goes to show you, no family is perfect.

Stegpry14

References/further reading:

Auletta, A., Rayor, L.S. (2011). Preferential prey sharing among kin not found in the social huntsman spider, Delena cancerides (Sparassidae). Journal of Arachnology, 39, 258-262

Aviles, L. (1997). Causes and consequences of cooperation and permanent sociality in spiders, in: The evolution of social behavior in insects and arachnids. Pg 476-496. Crespi, B. & Chloe, J. Eds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

Aviles, L., Tufino, P. (1998). Colony size and individual fitness in the social spider Anelosimus eximius. The American Naturalist, 152, 403-418.

Beavis, A.S., Rowell, D.M., Evans, T. (2007). Cannibalism and kin recognition in Delena cancerides (Araneae: Sparassidae), a social huntsman spider. Journal of Zoology 271, 233-237.

Bilde, T., Lubin, Y. (2011). Group living in spiders: Cooperative breeding and coloniality in: Spider behavior: Flexibility and versatility. Pg 275-298. Herberstein, M.E. Ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

Buskirk, R.E. (1981). Sociality in the Arachnida in: Social Insects II. Pg 281-367. Hermann, H. R. Eds. Academic Press, New York, London.

Lubin, Y., Bilde, T. (2007). The evolution of sociality in spiders. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 37, 83-145.

Yip, E.C., Clarke, S., Rayor, L.S. (2009). Aliens among us: Nestmate recognition in the social huntsman spider, Delena cancerides. Insectes Sociaux, 56, 223-231

Yip, E.C., Rayor, L.S. (2013). The influence of siblings on body condition in a social spider: Is prey sharing cooperation or competition? Animal Behavior, 85, 1161-1168.

Yip, E.C., Rayor, L.S. (2014). Maternal care and subsocial behavior in spiders. Biological Reviews, 89, 427-449.

 

Cameron Jones is a PhD student in the Animal Behavior Graduate Group at the University of California Davis. 

Advertisements

About The Ethogram

The official blog of the UC Davis Animal Behavior Graduate Group.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s